Editorial Policy
Voice and tone
Every interpretation speaks in second person. We address you, not a generic reader. Our tone is warm but authoritative, psychologically grounded, and concrete. We do not use em dashes, en dashes, or emoji. We do not use the word delve, the metaphor tapestry, or any of the other phrases an automated style scrubber rejects on every build.
Accuracy and grounding
Astrological claims are grounded in our trait registry. Psychological concepts are sourced from the bibliography listed under Sources. We do not claim astrology is empirical science. We do not diagnose anyone or substitute for clinical care. When a page touches on attachment, shadow, or trauma material, we frame it as a reflective prompt, not as a verdict.
Sensitive topics
Trauma, attachment wounds, and shadow patterns can land hard if described carelessly. We do not write content that pathologizes a placement, blames a sign for someone's behavior, or encourages obsessive interpretation. Healing language is the default. If a reader is in distress, we link to general mental health resources rather than substituting astrology for support.
Celebrity content
When we reference a public figure, we state only their declared natal placements (sun, moon, rising) drawn from public birth data, with the source linked. We do not psychoanalyze, diagnose, or speculate about real people, and we never describe their personal lives beyond what they have themselves made public.
Reviewer attestation
Every published page carries a reviewer byline and a date of last review. The reviewer attests that the page passed all automated quality gates and that its claims are grounded in the trait registry and source bibliography.
Corrections
Errors get fixed openly. See Corrections for how to report one and how we handle them.